T. W. Baldwin
Volume 1
 
© 1944 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved
PAGES
* PAGE
  GO TO   
 
Previous Page
Next Page
 
CHAPTER
Previous Section,
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Go to Table of Contents
 
SEARCH
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRINTABLE
Print a lo-res (150 dpi) PDF image of this page
 
HELP
Get Help    
Volumes Available
  Navigate This Volume


[ About the Books ] [ Volume One ] [ Volume Two ]
[ Search ]
[ Links] [ Home ]


© 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved

OCRed data provided for searching only.
4 SMALL LATINE AND LESSE GREEKE Or for the lawrell, he may gaine a scorne, For a good Poet's made, as well as borne. And such wert thou. Looke how the fathers face Lines in his issue, euen so, the race Of Shakespeare: minde, and manners brightly shines In his well torned, and true filed lines: In each of which, he seemes to shake a Lance, As brandish't at the eyes of Ignorance. Jonson here accounts for this overwhelming greatness of Shakspere. Nature herself rejoiced to be clothed in his lines, so that she now lets Aristophanes, Terence, and Plautus deserted lie as if they were not of Nature's family. But Nature must not receive all the credit; Shakspere's Art must also receive part of it. For though the Poets matter, Nature be, His Art cloth giue the fashion. The poet must by Art shape his matter, "For a good Poet's made, as well as borne." So Shakspere's mind and manners brightly shine, "In his well torned, and true filed lines." Jonson then ends by making a heavenly constellation of this "Sweet Swan of .1'uon." Thus while Shakspere is fundamentally indebted to Nature, yet he owes a great deal to Art. How much of this Jonson really meant I do not profess to know-I am none of God's spies 1-; but this is what he says. And it is Shakspere's subject matter that Jonson attributes to Nature, which no one essentially denies. But "His Art cloth giue the fashion," which again no one ought essentially to deny. It is in subject matter, which comes of Nature, that Shakspere has surpassed Aristophanes, Terence, and Plautus, who now antiquated, and deserted lye As they were not of Natures family. Then of shaping Art Shakspere is admitted to have had some, though the degree as compared with that of Aristophanes, Terence, and Plautus is not stated. But it is doubtless significant that Jonson chooses Aristophanes, Terence, and Plautus with whom to make his comparison. Terence and Plautus were more or less well known to every learned grammarian, and Jonson knew even better than we that Shakspere was acquainted with them. That knowledge in no way affects the accuracy of Jonson's pronouncement upon Shakspere's "small Latine, and Jesse Greeke."